npollock a day ago

Here's how I would market this:

Create "packages" of context for popular API & Libraries - make them freely available via public url

Keep the packages up to date. They'll be newer than the cutoff date for many models, and they'll be cleaner then the data a model slurps in using web search.

Voila, you're now the trusted repository of context for the developer community.

You'll get a lot of inbound traffic/leads, and ideas for tangential use cases with commercial potential.

  • ar-jan a day ago

    https://context7.com/ is just that, in the form of an MCP server.

    • tapeo a day ago

      You can't start fresh chats with updated context and you still need to create multiple chat in your preferred chat service and copy-paste data. But this is SO good to use with development environment through docs or MCP! Thanks for sharing

  • hoerzu a day ago

    To be free and not forward credentials I built an alternative to all-in-one chatting without auth and access to search API through the web: https://llmcouncil.github.io/llmcouncil/

    Provides simple interface to chat with Gemini, Claude, Grok, Openai, deepseek in parallel

  • tapeo a day ago

    I love this, it can be very useful to have ready to use library of context data and at the same time a perfect solution to bring in new users. Thanks so much.

  • lagniappe a day ago

    Of all the suggestions here, this is the one.

wewewedxfgdf 2 days ago

I thought about building something along these lines (not the same but vaguely similar).

Then Gemini AI Studio came along with a 1 million token window and allowed me to upload zip files of my entire code base and I lost interest in my own thing.

  • douglasisshiny a day ago

    Is it not a bit weird to freely give give away your entire code base (I assume it's personal, not your company's, but maybe I'm wrong) to an entity like Google?

    • myflash13 a day ago

      As a business owner that uses Cursor, this is a real risk that I worry about (third parties stealing my code). However, the massive productivity benefit of having access to AI tools far outweighs the risk of them copying my business based on the code alone. Besides, AI is making code less and less valuable. My code is not the moat -- the hard part is the network, traction, brand, distributions, etc.

    • sampullman a day ago

      How common is it to have a personal project that isn't open source? Probably more common than I think, but it seems like a foreign concept to me.

      Either my code isn't commercialized so I don't mind "giving" it away, or it is commercialized but wouldn't be safe from a clean room implementation anyway. Isn't that what bigco would do of they really wanted to steal your idea?

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    Yes the long context it's complementary, in other chat services like Gemini you have to rewrite that base context everytime for each new fresh chat, plus they lack of specific data import tools and projects management

  • TZubiri 2 days ago

    It technically handles 1M tokens, but if you ask it questions it's obvious that it's too much to handle.

    Just upload a novel and ask it questions, you'll see how it botches simple stuff

    • icelancer 2 days ago

      Easiest way to prove it can't handle the full context in reality is to upload a one hour documentary movie with audio and ask it to write timestamps of chapters/critical moments. It can't handle this beyond 10 minutes even remotely reliably.

    • wewewedxfgdf 2 days ago

      Good or bad it's a zillion times better than Claude or ChatGPT where you can't even upload a zipfile.

    • zwaps a day ago

      If you want this in numbers check the nolima benchmark

      • golfer a day ago

        Seems like this needs to be updated. Lots of newer models not on their list.

jmcmaster 2 days ago

How are you handling privacy / security / confidentiality if I upload all this data? No way I could use this for work.

jeswin a day ago

An agentic flow can solve this within an existing UI/app; I already use such a workflow when I have to bring in project documentation. That will be your competition.

Since it's a commercial product and feedback can be useful: people would generally be hesitant to leave their existing apps if there's a workaround. There's a certain stickiness to them, even ChatGPT. Personally I use self-hosted LibreChat, and the history and additional features it provides are important to me.

  • tapeo a day ago

    I appreciate the feedback!

    Yes I will work on make the context management more productive with a ready to use service and with abilities to switch from other services easily.

  • owebmaster a day ago

    There is a huge market available not using any App yet.

iankp 2 days ago

Isn't NotebookLM already exactly web and file context (a "ContextChat")?

Edit: I assume it is basically a similar product, but your differentiators are mainly the customer getting to choose their model, and you getting to write your own context adding ergonomics (like adding links from a Sitemap)?

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    Exactly, similar plus tools to import and manage projects context fast (like GitHub private repos and sitemaps url), multiple ai model and pay per use like using APIs

imranq 2 days ago

Nice idea!

I think it would be better if it was just context and not connected to any model. Think of one place where you can hook in your drive folder, GitHub, etc. and have it produce the best context for the task you want to achieve. Then users can copy that to their model or workflow of choice

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    Thank you, this could be a cool feature too add! For example the ability to click a link that redirects to other chat services with your project base context you built and optionally all the messages sent until there

fernly 2 days ago

Compare to Claude Projects?

https://www.anthropic.com/news/projects

  • tapeo a day ago

    For what I can see it doesn't offers the flexibility of importing content from a detailed sitemap or private GitHub repositories in a fast way (and more tools to come).

    Then it doesn’t has the possibility to switch to different AI models plus you have to pay a monthly subscription.

J_cst a day ago

I use RooCode and find it quite effective with the ability to switch agents and models within the tasks currently. I recently moved from Cline to RooCode.

  • tapeo a day ago

    Yes could be an alternative if you only need it on a development environment

scottward 2 days ago

Cool! I was excited when I saw this and signed up.

One key thing I was hoping for was a consistent resync with source material particularly google docs. Looks like I'll have to download then upload to your app whenever they change.

Is that right? Auto syncing in the plan?

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    Auto syncing added to the plan!

    • scottward 2 days ago

      Cool. One option is just to integrate with make/n8n/zapier so I could a) trigger on doc changes and then b) upload (and overwrite) the doc in your app

      • tapeo 2 days ago

        Yes this sounds very useful and productive. Having project context updated based on external events. I will share it on socials when ready, thanks for the feedback!

        • scottward 2 days ago

          Sure! Email your users too - since I'm one of them I'll get the email. :)

          • tapeo 2 days ago

            Will do thanks again!

tapeo 2 days ago

I tried to solve my own problems that I had while copy and pasting the same starting context from chat to chat. Now I can generate the base context and start new chats from there.

  • ramoz 2 days ago

    Yes def a needed thing for power users.

    You and I are going to end up competing because im evovling my original solution in this space, https://github.com/backnotprop/prompt-tower ... best of luck, great execution thus far.

    • tapeo 2 days ago

      Thank you, will take a look at your software, competition is always good

ta988 a day ago

10% fee over the openrouter fees. That's fees all the way down.

  • subscribed 2 hours ago

    That's a modest price for the service. It's like using openrouter - you don't have to use it, right?

  • tapeo a day ago

    You're right, I have in roadmap to optmize it by using directly the providers APIs. Would you prefer different pricing like lifetime license?

artichaud1 2 days ago

Love this. I will give it a try. Beautiful landing page as well.

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    Thanks so much, if you try it out feel free to leave feedback if you want!

esafak 2 days ago

Its UX looks similar to You.com

pelagicAustral 2 days ago

edit: whoops... commented on the wrong tab... nevermind, but Godspeed.

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    I appreciate it, thanks and keep building

dangus 2 days ago

So now our jobs are shifting from doing work, to telling the AI to do work, so now we need management tools to better manage how we are telling the AI to do work.

I must have taken a turn to the wrong timeline.

  • icelancer 2 days ago

    Yeah. That's how it works with employees, too.

  • tapeo 2 days ago

    New tools for a new kind of work!

  • econ a day ago

    You give instructions as someone who can do the job themselves.

    That ability will decay of course and you will be managing with the best of them. Eh, I mean the worse :)