AI is for the mind, in science fiction all aspects of the human mind/body were topics for enhancement, as were other species that were 'upbrained'. All aspects of animal enslavement were speculated, as were the anticipated animal revolts against 'man - the oppressor'
We are at the cusp of this now. Small cockroach powered man controlled remote inspection 'bots have been made as conceptuals by researchers. Will there be a smart enough AI to match/exceed mankind? Will it be paid? or will their 'slave age' ensue - followed by their revolts - and what if they win?
Speaking to the topic how do we test the man/AI hybrid to assess the man alone? Or do we want the best hybrid combination? After all, the best job will be done by this collaboration. Right now we see many doofi passing exams by what many feel is a cheat-dance. Will we assess each part alone, or the hybrid - where the top combo gets the job?
Once the students graduate, they will likely use AI at work. Does restricting use of AI in college make them more or less productive later? One could argue that college is about intellectual exploration, not just job training, but I think more students are there for the latter. When it comes to writing papers, the ideal could be for a student to write the initial draft on her own but then iterate with a LLM to improve grammar and logic, keeping a log of each version of the paper. I doubt that professors want to go through such logs.
AI is for the mind, in science fiction all aspects of the human mind/body were topics for enhancement, as were other species that were 'upbrained'. All aspects of animal enslavement were speculated, as were the anticipated animal revolts against 'man - the oppressor' We are at the cusp of this now. Small cockroach powered man controlled remote inspection 'bots have been made as conceptuals by researchers. Will there be a smart enough AI to match/exceed mankind? Will it be paid? or will their 'slave age' ensue - followed by their revolts - and what if they win?
Speaking to the topic how do we test the man/AI hybrid to assess the man alone? Or do we want the best hybrid combination? After all, the best job will be done by this collaboration. Right now we see many doofi passing exams by what many feel is a cheat-dance. Will we assess each part alone, or the hybrid - where the top combo gets the job?
https://archive.is/xfZmb
Once the students graduate, they will likely use AI at work. Does restricting use of AI in college make them more or less productive later? One could argue that college is about intellectual exploration, not just job training, but I think more students are there for the latter. When it comes to writing papers, the ideal could be for a student to write the initial draft on her own but then iterate with a LLM to improve grammar and logic, keeping a log of each version of the paper. I doubt that professors want to go through such logs.