FiddlerClamp 9 minutes ago

Interestingly, Peanuts started with a focus on Shermy and Violet as the 'straight men' and young(er) Charlie Brown as the comic upstart. Snoopy shows up fairly soon, but he doesn't even seem to be CB's pet for the first while.

It's fascinating to see Lucy, Linus, Schroeder and Sally grow from tots or babies to the developed characters we know today.

analog31 31 minutes ago

I'm a musician, and something I've noticed is that children no longer recognize the "peanuts" theme song.

gilgoomesh an hour ago

> Charlie Brown may have been as popular as any character in all of literature

Was he? Maybe this is true inside the US but from outside the US, I've always viewed the character as a peculiarly American artefact – something I was aware of but never really read or watched. This seemed to be reinforced by most major Charlie Brown titles seemingly tied to other American customs like Halloween and baseball.

  • eru 3 minutes ago

    People in eg Germany are mostly aware of the Peanuts, but it's nowhere near as central to the culture as in the US.

  • mttpgn 38 minutes ago

    The BBC published this article. I agree with "all of literature" being hyperbolic though.

  • solarmist an hour ago

    I'm an American and I've really never related to Charlie Brown myself, but I've heard Peanuts is huge in Japan and other asian countries.

andrewstuart 2 hours ago

I think many people have seen only the commercially exploited peanuts imagery.

In fact the comics - especially the older ones are incredibly clever and funny and insightful and there’s long running threads and connections and strong characters.

Peanuts the tshirt/hat/poster/cup is crass.

Peanuts the comic is genius.

It exactly the same with Donald Duck and Uncle Scrooge. The commercially exploited imagery is crass and dumb. The comics written by Karl Barks were genius and often really entertaining adventure stories.

  • antonymoose an hour ago

    I would think the closest comparison to my eye is the Calvin and Hobbes commercialization? As a child of the 90s, I almost exclusively knew of Calvin stickers pissing on Ford and Chevy logos growing up. The great comic was a pleasant surprise for my teenage self.

    • jdlshore an hour ago

      Watterson refused to allow Calvin & Hobbes to be commercialized, other than the books. Those crass stickers are unauthorized knock-offs.

      • antonymoose 37 minutes ago

        Amazing - these were Circle K chain stores selling these stickers. How was this not enforced?!

  • MPSimmons an hour ago

    I mean, even originally, Garfield strips had some substance, but Jim Davis really liked money, I think...

    • eru 2 minutes ago

      Garfield was conceived from the get go as a cash grab devoid of artistic merit.

      (And that's fine by me, nobody is forcing anyone to consume Garfield.)

  • lurking_swe 2 hours ago

    Speak for yourself, i enjoy both. :)